Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

SUO: Re: One Stone Fits All

To: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
Subject: SUO: Re: One Stone Fits All
From: "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:28:22 -0700
Cc: <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
References: <4417832.1057685251123.JavaMail.nobody@wamui03.slb.atl.earthlink.net> <3F0B0541.697FAD5F@att.net> <3F0B6EC1.EF0F551A@att.net> <3F0DB268.9070102@bestweb.net>
Reply-To: "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-standard-upper-ontology@majordomo.ieee.org



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>


> JA> Can you explain to me in your own words
> > how you think that Quine demolished the
> > analytic/synthetic dichotomy?
> 
> Good question.  In any case, I would throw the words "analytic" and
> "synthetic" into the same dustbin as "universals" and "particulars".

What about "species" and "individuals"?  Into the dustbin?

Ted Dace

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SUO: Re: One Stone Fits All
  - From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>

References:
- SUO: One Calculus At A Time
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: One Stone Fits All (Was Epitaph To Ontology As Science)
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- Re: SUO: Re: One Stone Fits All
  - From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>

Prev by Date: SUO: Re: More Sand In The Gyres
Next by Date: SUO: Re: One Stone Makes a Beach
Prev by thread: SUO: Re: More Sand In The Gyres
Next by thread: Re: SUO: Re: One Stone Fits All
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread