SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
sounds like a good last word on that,
probably time to look for a more
productive line of inquiry.
jon
John F. Sowa wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> That is another important distinction:
>
> > I was speaking about the distinction between physics
> > and philology, figments that we fit to reality and
> > figments that we fit into fits, in the lay sense
> > of the term.
>
> Physics is the subject that studies and categorizes
> what exists in the physical world. It is essential
> to building up the set of categories that we need
> to represent the things that exist in the world
>
> Philology studies words and how they came to aquire
> the features and relationships they have. It is
> essential to building up the set of categories
> that we need to represent the way people talk
> about the world and their ways of viewing it.
>
> John
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
- References:
- SUO: CG: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, and RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, and RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, and RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- Re: SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>