SUO: Re: SUO Postings
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
[reposting after 1.5 hours]
Mike,
If you have a specific question about the relevance
of one of my postings to the SUO Scope and Purpose,
or a request for clarification about any issue
that I have written on, please formulate it
in a way that I can do something positive
about it.
Thanks In Prospect,
Jon Awbrey
P.S. In my perception, a large part of the recent volume
has consisted of John Sowa's cross-postings from the CG List,
some of whose pertinence to SUO work seems a bit remote to me,
but I never would, and never have so far, tried to second guess
another hard-working participant's judgment about such questions
without trying to give an explicit, focused, and specific reason.
If you have a question that you would be able to rephrase in those
terms, please be considerate enough to share it, and I will do my
best to address it. ~~ JA
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Mike Pool wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> Didn't you recently promise to try to limit the number of your postings
> and to keep them focused? I won't comment on the latter pledge, but I
> count 27 postings from you on the three days Oct. 13-15. The result is
> an overwhelming amount of traffic on the list, and I, for one, would be
> most appreciative if you would concatenate a number of your messages
> into one or two daily postings. The end result would likely be that
> people would pay more attention to the postings that you do make.
>
> best regards,
>
> Mike Pool
>
> At 08:30 AM 10/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> >
> >sounds like a good last word on that,
> >probably time to look for a more
> >productive line of inquiry.
> >
> >jon
> >
> >John F. Sowa wrote:
> > >
> > > Jon,
> > >
> > > That is another important distinction:
> > >
> > > > I was speaking about the distinction between physics
> > > > and philology, figments that we fit to reality and
> > > > figments that we fit into fits, in the lay sense
> > > > of the term.
> > >
> > > Physics is the subject that studies and categorizes
> > > what exists in the physical world. It is essential
> > > to building up the set of categories that we need
> > > to represent the things that exist in the world
> > >
> > > Philology studies words and how they came to aquire
> > > the features and relationships they have. It is
> > > essential to building up the set of categories
> > > that we need to represent the way people talk
> > > about the world and their ways of viewing it.
> > >
> > > John
> >
> >o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
- References:
- SUO: CG: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, and RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, and RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, and RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & ReDeFo Logic, Or Not
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- Re: SUO: Re: Logic, Topic Maps, & RDF
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>