SUO Re: Fw: Final Procedures Documents
Jim,
I restate my objection to the inclusion of the SUMO motion of June 14,
2003 as a passed motion (Motion # 2 on the web site referenced below).
This motion received 31 yes votes from 79 eligible voters. 40 yes votes
were required for passage. The rule that an email vote must receive a
yes vote from a majority of the eligible voters is stated in both the
IEEE By-Laws and also (specifically for the SUO WG) in a unanimous
resolution of the IEEE-SA Board of Governors. Both the by-law and the
BoG resolution were in effect when the vote was taken. Both were
brought to the attention of the chair at the time of the vote.
Bob
jim.s3@JUNO.COM wrote:
>SUO WG,
>
> One more time. Are there any objections to this version of the
>referenced procedures document.
>
>Jim Schoening
>Chair
>
>
>
>
>--------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITABEI" <matthew.west@shell.com>
>To: "Standard-Upper-Ontology (E-mail)"
><standard-upper-ontology@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:02:59 +0100
>Subject: Final Procedures Documents
>
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>The "Final" V1 of the Procedures Document can be found at:
>
>http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUO-Procedures/documents.html
>
>Please check and confirm that I have made the updates as discussed
>for any issues you have raised on the previous version.
>
>
>Matthew West
>Streamline Business Information Architect for Supply Chain Management
>Shell Information Technology International Limited
>Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
>
>Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
>Email: matthew.west@shell.com
>Internet: http://www.shell.com
>http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
>
>
>