Matthew,
Thank you for the information.
In the document to which you refer http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUO-Procedures/Documents/SUO-Development-GuidelinesV1Final.txt
at :
5.1 Stage 1 –Approval
...
If the motion is passed the work becomes authorised by the
Standard Upper Ontology Working Group.
Note: The motions for existing starter documents are
considered here to be Approval motions.
The Standard Upper Ontology Working Group Chair shall
maintain a publicly available and numbered list of motions
that pass as resolutions of the Standard Upper Ontology
Working Group.
I interpret this to mean that the list of documents on the SUO web site
http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUO-Procedures/documents.html
under the heading Resolutions ( http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/resolutions.html ) are the "list of motions that pass as
resolutions of the Standard Upper OntologyWorking Group" mentioned
above. If so, then I do object.
The text quoted above links these documents and categorizes the June
2003 SUMO motion a passed and approved motion. It failed. If I am
misinterpreting your meaning, please advise me how.
One way to handle this is to simply not list the SUMO motion as
approved or alternatively note in the listing that the result of the
vote is in dispute and the motion's final status will be posted when
the dispute is resolved.
Bob
Bob
West, Matthew R SITI-ITABEI wrote:
Dear
Bob,
I
understand your objection to that, but that is not what is being asked
here.
It
is perhaps a littel confusing that Jim give the link to the page on
which the procedures
documents
can be found rather than the document itself. The document can be found
at
for
a text version or:
for
a pdf version.
SUMO
is not mentioned in either of them.
Matthew West
Streamline Business Information Architect for Supply Chain Management
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
Mathew,
I object to the inclusion of the June 2003 SUMO motion (Motion #2 on
the referenced site) as an adopted motion. The motion failed.
An acceptable change would be to remove this motion from the list of
adopted motions. As you know, I am pursuing this matter through the
IEEE channels. These processes move slowly.
Bob
West, Matthew R SITI-ITABEI wrote:
Dear Bob,
Could you indicate please what changes I would need to make to the document to overcome
your objection?
Matthew West
Streamline Business Information Architect for Supply Chain Management
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Spillers [mailto:skydog@PACBELL.NET]
Sent: 25 May 2004 16:48
To: jim.s3@JUNO.COM; SUO
Subject: SUO: Final Procedures Documents
Jim,
You wrote:
I don't see where you are refering to. What URL is it at?
I am referring to the document
http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUO-Procedures/documents.html
which is the document you referenced in your email of 05/23/04, which
asked:
Are there any objections to this version of the
referenced procedures document.
Yes, I object.
Bob
|