Re: nature -> "human brain" -> "language terms" ==>> knowledge ?
Dear Chris,
Within the purposes of my proposal, I am trying to use the "high-level" methods of the "empirical", "stochastical" "macro"-analysis, leaving the "internals" be untouched. May I suggest the crude analogy of my approach with the methods, being exploited in the domain of the ThermoDynamics, which deals with the resulting Temperature and Pressure parameters, while ignoring molecular origins of the underlying physical phenomena.
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Alex
-- <chrislofting@OZEMAIL.COM.AU> wrote:
It all reduces to the language of the neuron Alex, differentiating and integrating with some mediation when necessary.
FROM that comes emotions (resulting from a focus on CONTEXT, be to replace it or coexist with it)and from there stems the more 'serial' forms of communication - the spoken/written word where rather than express our emotions we talk about our feelings ;-) (frontal lobes of the brain REPRESS emotional reactions, allowing for aquisition of more data etc and so MEDIATION of stimulus/response dynamics)
Object-oriented perspectives reflect the encapsulation process (differentiating) and the operations WITHIN that encapsulation of the same differentiating/integrating dynamics - where we relabel things to focus on objects/relationships.
The use of recursion of dichotomies allows for the generatation of specialist qualities, labelled into becoming a language used to describe that specialisation.
Chris.
http://www.iimetro.com.au/~lofting/myweb
This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au