Re: nature -> "human brain" -> "language terms" ==>> knowledge ?
Chris,
You have made many statements about perception, most
of them obvious, some debatable, and some dubious.
But you fail to recognize a simple point:
1. A statement about the world is verified or falsified
by observation and experiment upon the world.
2. The method of arriving at a statement does not
affect its truth or falsity.
If you can't understand this point, I have no confidence
in anything you say.
CL> For example, you have FAILED totally in comprehending
> what I have presented re a property of recursion in its
> encoding of meaning.
Indeed, I have failed to see anything insightful, notable,
or useful in what you have said. I will give you the
benefit of the doubt: perhaps you have some deep insight
that you don't know how to express in ways that I can
understand.
When you learn how to express your deep thoughts, let me
know. Until then, I will continue to ignore your web site.
John