Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: D7 - Which languages are better than OWL?

To: standard-upper-ontology@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: D7 - Which languages are better than OWL?
From: Philippe Martin <phmartin@phmartin.info>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:26:04 +0100
Cc: phmartin@phmartin.info
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:18:48 PST"
List-Help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STANDARD-UPPER-ONTOLOGY>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STANDARD-UPPER-ONTOLOGY>
List-Owner: <mailto:STANDARD-UPPER-ONTOLOGY-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:STANDARD-UPPER-ONTOLOGY-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:STANDARD-UPPER-ONTOLOGY-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Reply-To: phmartin@phmartin.info
Sender: standard-upper-ontology@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

> I think the experiences, background and perspectives in knowledge 
> engineering and knowledge representation among the principals involved 
> in the creation of the CL standard qualify them to express an opinion
> ...
> There are various documents on the CL Web site (<http://cl.tamu.edu/>) 

Thanks. My purpose is not to doubt those principals, it is only to
organize information.

Philippe

Prev by Date: Re: D7 - Which languages are better than OWL?
Next by Date: Re: D7 - Which languages are better than OWL?
Prev by thread: Re: D7 - Which languages are better than OWL?
Next by thread: Re: D7 - Which languages are better than OWL?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread