| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
John, > I have no strong preference. Does anyone else have any > suggestions for a name that avoids confusion and has > a good acronym? I have nothing against the name: I think it is quite precise. It is the use of the acronym that causes confusion. Maybe this is my personal view but I stumble upon every use of FO as foundation ontology. To me, "Foundation ontology" is short enough to be used without an acronym. A