P&P: RE: RE: FW: Policy and Code of Practice for e-mail lists and Internet Resources V1 D1

["Philip Jackson" <phil.jackson@computer.org>]

Dear Matthew,

> MW: I think that two votes are necessary. I would expect that
> an offender would not necessarily expect that their
> contributions would be seen as breaking the code of practice,
> given as we have agreed that there is inevitably some
> interpretation involved. The first would be a clear warning.
> This might cause a change in behaviour. The second vote
> would be to remove.

I suppose you are right. The group's judgment needs to be reflected both in
the warning and in the decision to remove, which implies a vote in both
cases.

So, I still think we need to define the process a little better, making it
clear that only two votes are required, defining the time period for a
change of behavior, and the process for triggering both votes.

Phil