[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
P&P: RE: Re: Procedures document
Dear Frank,
See Jim's message below.
I believe I have addressed your speicific issues, around definitions,
in the draft below. Please confirm that your issues have been addressed
satisfactorily, or identify things I have missed.
Matthew West
Principal Consultant
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jim.s3@juno.com [mailto:jim.s3@juno.com]
> Sent: 12 January 2004 03:46
> To: suo-policies@ieee.org
> Subject: P&P: Re: Procedures document
>
>
>
>
> >
> > > Our starter documents are not progressing because
> > > nobody is submitting any comments, not for lack of a written
> > > process.
> >
> > MW: The reason no-one is submitting comments any more is simply
> > because
> > it is not possible to see how and whether comments have been
> > addressed.
> > Many (including myself) gave up making comments when there appeared
> > to be
> > no response for work that took considerable effort.
> >
> >
>
> Matthew,
>
> Well, you may be right, and I hope you are. I'd suggest you
> implement these procedures (even before the policy get
> approved) to see
> if that will generate more input to your 4D ontology.
>
> While I still don't see a compelling need for the procudures,
> they can only help, and probably can't hurt, so I'll withdraw my
> objections. I suggest you contact Frank Farance directly to see if he
> can live with the current version. I'm not sure if he reads all mail
> from this list, so if you can't reach him, let me know and
> I'll call him.
>
> Jim
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
>