P&P: RE: RE: Re: Procedures document

["West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>]

Dear Jim,

There is still no response from Frank. At what point can we assume
that this is because he has nothing further to say?


Matthew West
Principal Consultant
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk


> -----Original Message-----
> From: West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE 
> Sent: 12 January 2004 09:21
> To: suo-policies@ieee.org; Frank Farance
> Subject: P&P: RE: Re: Procedures document
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Frank,
> 
> See Jim's message below.
> 
> I believe I have addressed your speicific issues, around definitions,
> in the draft below. Please confirm that your issues have been 
> addressed
> satisfactorily, or identify things I have missed.
> 
> 
> Matthew West
> Principal Consultant
> Shell Information Technology International Limited
> Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
> 
> Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
> Email: matthew.west@shell.com
> Internet: http://www.shell.com
> http://www.matthew-west.org.uk
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jim.s3@juno.com [mailto:jim.s3@juno.com]
> > Sent: 12 January 2004 03:46
> > To: suo-policies@ieee.org
> > Subject: P&P: Re: Procedures document
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Our starter documents are not progressing because
> > > > nobody is submitting any comments, not for lack of a written 
> > > > process.  
> > > 
> > > MW: The reason no-one is submitting comments any more is simply 
> > > because
> > > it is not possible to see how and whether comments have been 
> > > addressed.
> > > Many (including myself) gave up making comments when 
> there appeared 
> > > to be
> > > no response for work that took considerable effort.
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > Matthew,
> > 
> >         Well, you may be right, and I hope you are.  I'd suggest you
> > implement these procedures (even before the policy get 
> > approved) to see
> > if that will generate more input to your 4D ontology.
> > 
> >         While I still don't see a compelling need for the 
> procudures,
> > they can only help, and probably can't hurt, so I'll withdraw my
> > objections.  I suggest you contact Frank Farance directly 
> to see if he
> > can live with the current version.  I'm not sure if he 
> reads all mail
> > from this list, so if you can't reach him, let me know and 
> > I'll call him.
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> > Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> > 
> 
>