Phone Conference P1450.1 Working Doc Subgroup
Thurs. May 23, 2002 8:00 am PDT
Attendees:
David Kellerman
Peter Wohl
Jason Doege
Tony Taylor
Doug Sprague
Jim Teisher
Scribe: Jim Teisher
Documents
p1450.1 D13 draft March 21.
D13 review-resolution document Apr 27.
Agenda
Continue following the current process to review issues identified in
the resolution doc that was updated by Tony. We focused on issues that
had nothing in the Resolution column.
Issues Discussed
- GR-8 (ref to X statement on page 39 & Apendix N) We are currently using
the Pattern block to express fail data with the X statement. There have
been several inputs that this section is confusing. Should another
keyword be used to replace the Pattern keyword in this situation
e.g., FailPattern), or should other keywords be added to the pattern block.
Comment have been recieved that this does not solve all of the datalog
problems. Reply: It is not suppose to solve all datalog problems. (What
are the other datalog problems? Do we have a list?)
Jason is forming a small task force that will address fail feedback
format which has responsibilities spread across .1, .3, and .6. He is
hoping to get together representatives from structural test and EDA to
solve this quickly. Hopefully GR-8 would be resolved by this group.
- GR-9 It is confusing as to which statements in the standard are
declarative and which are procedural (run-time). Most of the statements
are declarative, but the document needs to be read and procedural
statements explicitly identified. Jim to talk to Tony about this.
- GR-15 Tony to resync numbers
- GR-18 Tony to modify reference
- GR-20 Tony to modify reference
- GR-21 This is similar to GR-8 and is referred to Jason's task force on
Fail Data Feedback
- GM-1 & GM-2 Peter to talk to Greg and report back.
- GR-3 Same as GR-9
- GM-4 Peter thought he had talked to Greg and resolved these. Peter to
talk to Greg and report back.
- GM-5 Peter to review
- Document Completion Urgency - There was some discussion about an urgency
to complete this document. The possibility of meeting was brought up, but
it was decided to just step up the activity and continue working every
two weeks.
Next Meeting
In two weeks; May 9, 2002, back to normal time of 10:00 AM PDT.
Meeting was ajourned at 9:00 PDT.
Action Items
(existing AI's from previous meeting)
[AI1]: Jason to orchestrate discussions for standard label definitions
and application of fail feedback in this context, correlated with CTL.
[AI2]: Tony add words to 16.1 to identify If and While as run-time
evaluated constructs. Also to 12.4.
[AI3]: Peter to discuss with Denis about use of ScanStructures as a
pattern statement.
[AI4]: Jason to distribute some more concepts on tiling support.
[AI5]: Greg to clarify the termination of \m.
[AI6]: Tony to cross-reference Annexes into Clause 1.
[AI7]: Greg to elaborate on application of \e.
AI's brought up in this meeting
Jason's AI covered in AI4
[AI8] DS-2 Doug to rewrite 6.1, last paragraph
[AI9] DS-1 Greg to rewrite 6.6
[AI10] GR-8 Jason to form Fail Data Feedback Task Force
[AI11] GR-9 Jim & Tony to come up with plan