Attendees: Ric Dokken, Scott Franzen, Carey Garrenton, Greg Maston, Jim O'Reilly, Ernie Wahl NOTE: there was no meeting (no quorum) on June 23, 2015. Line and clause numbers if any are with regard to STIL.4 syntax document D01 dated May 25, 2015. ================================================================================ Clause 6. Extensions to STIL.0 Clause 6.3 "Reserved words" CONSENSUS: this clause remains classified as Mixed ACTION ITEMS: Ric: provide a rationale for splitting into Basic/Extended Jim: rewrite classifying Table 1 as Basic and Table 2 as Mixed and add a column to Table 2 classifying each keyword. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clause 11. Extensions to STIL.0 Clause 15 "SignalGroups block" CONSENSUS: remove lines 1558 - 1566 (special mention of global keywords is unnecessary). CONSENSUS: remove lines 1595 - 1604 yellow section (STIL.0 is clear enough to deduce empty signal group syntax and STIL.4 has an example of an empty signal group definition on line 2172). ACTION ITEMS: Ernie: remove items from official document as per CONSENSUS above CONSENSUS: classify remainder of this clause as Extended -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clause 13. Extensions to STIL.0 Clause 17 "PatternBurst block" CONSENSUS: classify entire clause including 13.1 as Extended -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding the motion to change keyword "Channel" to "Resource", as per Greg Maston: "Resource" is a statement in the STIL.3 tester targeting standard (see clause 9. "Resource statement"). ================================================================================ NEXT WEEK: Clause 16. Extensions to STIL.2 Clause 10.1 "DCLevels block syntax" Basic: the portion highlighted in yellow is basic only if Clause 24. "Device" is classified as Basic Extended: the remainder of this clause ================================================================================