Attendees: Gerald Chan, Ric Dokken, Scott Franzen, Carey Garrenton, Greg Maston, Jim O'Reilly, Ernie Wahl

Line and clause numbers if any are with regard to STIL.4 syntax document D02 dated 01/20/17.

================================================================================
OLD BUSINESS:

1. Clause "32. TestType Definition":
    REPLACE: For each standard-defined test-type, STIL.4 or STIL.5 shall describe its function and how it uses its parameters to perform that function.
    WITH: Each standard-defined test-type shall be accompanied by a description of its function and how it uses its parameters to perform that function.
          That description should enable replicating test results across various ATE with identical electrical properties.

2. Insert in clause "21.1 Literal Values" after 2nd paragraph (rewritten from May 9, 2016 doc, Line 662):
    User-data AMPERES, CELSIUS, DECIBELS, DEGREES, FARADS, HENRIES, HERTZ, METERS, OHMS, SECONDS, VOLTS, and WATTS represent literal values with appropriate units, e.g., 100mA for AMPERES. PERCENT represents an integer or REAL followed by a percent sign, e.g., 5%. REAL represents a floating point number without units, e.g., 0.05.

3. Add "Node" to clause "3. Definitions":
    used to describe a node in a directed flow graph (flow-node) or an electrical node in a circuit

4. Syntax BNF inconsistently uses ::=, :=, and =, 7/5/2016 consensus: use ::= for BNF

5. Meta-type "next_stmt" is not defined in Syntax Document

6. Review Annex D: determine whether it’s appropriate for this standard. Goal is to have ONLY informative Annexes.
================================================================================
DISCUSSION:
- Have TTSC approval to proceed to ballot.
- P1450.4 WG chair election.  6 yes, 1 abstain.  Jim approved as WG chair for 2017.

All line #s below refer to the Jan 20-dated document

1. Motion to restructure document (proposed by Jim), moving clause 6-8 into Clause 9 (now renumbered as clause 6).
   Metatypes defined in Annex D will be moved into this clause.  Replace, where appropriate, dot4-defined metatypes
   with existing dot0 metatypes.
   - Seconded by Ric.
   - Yes: Jim, Ric, Gerald, Greg, Ernie,Carey, Scott.  Motion carried.
2. Motion to remove 4898-4901 (Ric).  Seconded by Jim.
   - Yes: Ric, Gerald   No: Ernie, Greg, Carey, Scott   Abstain:  Jim
   - Not carried.
3. Motion to remove 4902-4904 (Ric).  Seconded by Jim
   - Yes: Carey, Scott, Greg, Gerald, Ric, Ernie, Jim
   - Motion carried
4. Motion to drop footnote 5 at 4911 (Jim).  Seconded by Ric.
   - Yes:  Ric, Greg, Scott, Carey, Jim, Gerald, Ernie.
   - Motion carried
5. Motion to delete 4910-4911 (Ric)  Seconded by Gerald
   - Yes: Ric, Gerald  No: Greg, Ernie, Carey, Scott, Jim
   - Motion not carried.
6. Motion to accept 4912-4918 (Jim).  Seconded by Ric
   - Amendment: Change “containment” to “reference” - line 4915 (offered by Carey).  Ric seconds
   - Yes:  Carey, Ric, Gerald, Jim, Ernie, Greg, Scott
   - Motion carried.
7. Motion to delete, at line 4920, starting at “therefore a category” to the end of that sentence (Ric). Second: Carey.
   - Amend: remove parenthetical statement at end lines 4923-4924. (Ric) Second: Carey
   - Amend: remove “Not” in line 4922 (Ernie).  Ernie to edit text to reflect the intent to allow both forms.  Second: Carey
   - Yes: Ernie, Carey, Jim, Scott, Greg, Gerald, Ric
   - Motion carried.
8. Motion to accept lines 4928-4930 (Jim)  Second: Ernie
   - Amend: Remove “This may appear redundant but in fact,” at lines 4928-4929.  Carey.  Second: Ernie
   - Yes: Jim, Ernie, Greg, Scott, Carey  No: Ric, Gerald.
   - Motion carried.
9. Motion to remove 4957-4959 (defined in Clause 9.7)  Jim:  Second: Ric
   - Yes: Jim, Ernie, Ric, Scott, Carey, Gerald, Greg
   - Motion carried
10. Motion to remove 4965-4968 (it’s a recommendation, not semantic rule) (Ric).  Second: Jim
    - Yes: Ric, Jim, Carey, Greg, Scott, Ernie, Gerald
    - Motion carried
11. Motion to remove 4979-4980 (Ric)  Second: Ernie
    - Yes: Ric, Ernie, Jim, Greg, Gerald, Carey, Scott
    - Motion carried.
12. Motion to remove illegal usages at lines 4985 and 4987 (Jim)  Second: Greg
    - Amend: remove 4984-4993. Change : to . in line 4983 (Carey) Second: Ric
    - Yes: Ric, Carey, Jim, Greg, Ernie, Gerald, Scott
    - Motion carried.
13. Motion to change “shall” in line 4996-4997 to “should” (soften it to remove mandatory requirement implied by “shall”) (Ric).  Second: Jim
    - Yes: Ric, Jim, Greg, Gerald, Carey, Scott   Abstain: Ernie
    - Motion carried.
14. Motion to accept (turn black) lines 5043 and 5058 in Clause 31 (Jim):  Second: Scott
    - Yes: Carey, Jim, Scott, Greg, Gerald, Ernie   Abstain: Ric
    - Motion carried.
15. Motion to delete 5427-5431 in Clause 35. (Ric).  Covered in Clause 31, lines 5004-5007.
    Ernie to review Clause 31 to insure that text in Clause 35 is completely represented.   Second:  Jim
    - Yes: Ric, Jim, Carey, Ernie, Gerald, Greg, Scott
    - Motion carried
16. Motion to remove grey highlighting at lines 5100-5114 Clause 32, and turn black (accept) Jim.  Second: Carey
    - Yes: Scott, Jim, Carey, Ernie, Greg.  Abstain: Ric, Gerald.
    - Motion carried.
17. Motion to clean up actions or operations usages to remove parentheses (see lines 3942-3944, Clause 24).
    Go through whole document and clean up this way.  Ernie:  Ric: Second.
    - Yes: Carey, Ric, Ernie, Greg, Jim, Scott, Gerald
    - Motion carried.
18. Motion to replace int_expr in lines 2322-2331 with unsigned_int_expr. Ernie. Second: Ric
    - Yes: Ernie, Ric, Carey, Scott, Gerald, Jim, Greg
    - Motion carried.
19. Motion: Remove “tracking” from FlowVariables (Clause 20) wherever it occurs.  Ric. Second
    Amend to direct Jim/Ernie to describe tracking expressions behavior in Clause dealing with expressions - 
    rules will apply to ALL expression assignments and initializations.  Second: Greg
    - Yes: Ric, Jim, Carey,  Greg, Scott, Ernie, No:   Abstain

Action items:  15,19: Ernie, Jim.  2-12: Ernie  13,14,16,17,18: Jim

20. Motion via 1/24/2016 email: turn the reviewed paragraphs black after performing carried-motion edits
    including removing struck out text (Ernie) Second: Ric
    - Yes: Ric, Jim, Carey, Greg, Scott, Gerald, Ernie
    - Motion carried.
21. Motion via 1/24/2016 email: delete sentence “When keyword Category is omitted in the Spec definition,
    an anonymous category is deemed present and may be referenced via index 0.” (Ernie)     - Second: Ric
    - Yes: Ric, Jim, Carey, Greg, Scott, Gerald, Ernie
    - Motion carried.
22. Motion via 1/25/2016 email: 4914: for completeness, append sentence “A spec-variable field may be referred to directly by a parameter
    or flow-variable of the appropriate type, e.g., Seconds, Volts, etc.” (Ernie)
    - Amend: the above wording includes change proposed by Carey
    - Yes: Carey, Ernie No: Ric
23. Motion via 1/25/2016 email: 4970: to maintain the distinction between initialization and assignment, change “assigned” to
   “initialized to” (that distinction is relevant at line 4976). (Ernie)
    - Yes: Carey, Ric, Ernie No:

Action items:  15,19: Ernie, Jim.  2-4,6-12: Ernie  13,14,16,17,18,20,21: Jim  NO action: 1, 5, 22, 23