Date Index (Page 304 of 364)
- Re: Motion 10v2 released
- From: Corliss, George
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:17:21 -0500 (EST)
- Re: ExactDotProduct
- From: Nate Hayes
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:48:41 -0500 (EST)
- Re: ExactDotProduct
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:39:10 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Motion 10v2 released
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:21:00 -0500 (EST)
- Re: ExactDotProduct
- From: Siegfried M. Rump
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:00:54 -0500 (EST)
- Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct YES
- From: Nate Hayes
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:42:43 -0500 (EST)
- Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct YES
- From: vaccaro
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:17:44 -0500 (EST)
- Re: ExactDotProduct
- From: Michel Hack
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:10:57 -0500 (EST)
- Re: ExactDotProduct
- From: James Demmel
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:45:35 -0500 (EST)
- ExactDotProduct
- From: Ulrich Kulisch
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:00:20 -0500 (EST)
- Motion 10v2 released
- From: J. Wolff v. Gudenberg
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:15:02 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct YES
- From: Prof. Dr. G. Mayer
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:41:55 -0500 (EST)
- Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct YES
- From: Stefan Siegel
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:40 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: Siegfried M. Rump
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:18 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: James Demmel
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:37:58 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:35:42 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: James Demmel
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:06:43 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: Siegfried M. Rump
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 15:51:29 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Can Motion 8.02 support proofs of correctness?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:46:53 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Can Motion 8.02 support proofs of correctness?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:41:17 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Another relevant consideration Re: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct
- From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:58:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Can Motion 8.02 support proofs of correctness?
- From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:34:07 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Can Motion 8.02 support proofs of correctness?
- From: John Pryce
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:52:01 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Zhu&Hayes paper mentioned by Jim Demmel (was: Exact dot product)
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:22:32 -0400 (EDT)
Return to top of Page
Mail converted by MHonArc