By now it should be clear to everybody that there is no single correct
way to convert an anonymous Inf to an interval, so the IA environment
must provide the means for the programmer (who may know) to choose, and
in the absence of any knowledge, Empty is the only sensible choice for
the "ordinary" conversion function, intval(x) (called interval(x) in
Arnold's 1788.proposal).
Perhaps Siegfried can make a case that intval(x) should be the one that
converts Inf to Tail, and propose a different function that returns Empty,
or perhaps intval(x,m) should have a second "mode" argument that does the
selection -- but then one still has to define implicit conversions.
Sorry, but at this point I still prefer Arnold's approch, though I welcome
the arrival of the realHull() function.