Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: requiring hardware is futile

To: David Hough 754R work <754r@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: requiring hardware is futile
From: Arnold Neumaier <Arnold.Neumaier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:47:28 +0100
Cc: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200811171855.mAHItfg1009092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: University of Vienna
References: <200811171855.mAHItfg1009092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080925)

David Hough 754R work schrieb:

Even so, the best way to get interval performance improved is probably to get
1788 finalized, then get language standards that support 1788, then get realistic
open source applications written according to those language standards
that can be used to compare performance onplatforms, then get an organization like SPEC to select a few of those to measure
interval performance, then get end users interested enough to make procurement
decisions based on those results.


I agree.


Arnold Neumaier

Follow-Ups:
- Re: requiring hardware is futile
  - From: amaricai

References:
- requiring hardware is futile
  - From: David Hough 754R work

Prev by Date: Re: intval(X.sup))
Next by Date: Re: Edge case conversions, exceptions to IEEE FPA
Previous by thread: requiring hardware is futile
Next by thread: Re: requiring hardware is futile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread