IEEE P1788 working group members:
I must apologize for an additional oversight of mine.
In particular, the proposer of Motion 1 (John Pryce)
sent an addendum to his rationale as follows:
=====
Note added after the discussion period:
Various people have pointed out perceived deficiencies in the
proposed notation. There has been useful discussion on this.
But no one has proposed a formal amendment to the motion.
Therefore it goes forward to a vote in its original form.
Please note you are not asked to fit into a notational strait-jacket.
The motion asks you to take the Notation Paper for what it is, and to
"follow" it flexibly, as is appropriate for your application.
=====
Please take that into consideration in your voting, which
may be by posting to stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sincerely,
Ralph Baker Kearfott
(acting chair, P1788)