Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation
From: Michel Kieffer <kieffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:59:13 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <498DC054.7010108@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <498DC054.7010108@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3)

Dear all,

my vote is yes.

Best regards,

Michel Kieffer

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

References:
- Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation: YES
  - From: Nacim RAMDANI

Prev by Date: the "set paradigm" is harmful
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation: YES
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation: YES
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation: YES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread