Re: P1788 Motion to amend Motion P1788/M0001.01_StandardizedNotation needs a second
Nate
---- Nate Hayes <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the definitions on page 4 and on page 7 in the notation document is
> speaking about relations between interval vectors and/or matricies.
> Therefore the component-wise definition given on page 4 agrees with the "iff
> x \in X and y \in Y" definition on page 7, i.e, the "x \in X" is speaking of
> each _interval_ x in the interval vector X, etc.
That would be sensible, but seems to me, if it meant that, it would say (using xx etc. to mean a box, and n for the number of components) it would either use the word "componentwise" or say
"xx \omega yy iff xx_i \omega yy_i for each i=1..n."
John