Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0002.01_ProcessStructure YES

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx, stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0002.01_ProcessStructure YES
From: amaricai@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:10:40 +0200 (EET)
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4

I vote YES. I think that 1788 should be compatible and close to 754-2008.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion P1788/M0002.01_ProcessStructure YES
  - From: Jean-Michel Muller

Prev by Date: Voting
Next by Date: Re: Motion P1788/M0002.01_ProcessStructure YES
Previous by thread: Re: Motion P1788/M0002.01_ProcessStructure YES
Next by thread: Re: Motion P1788/M0002.01_ProcessStructure YES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread