Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: A proposal for motion 5 "Arithmetic operations for intervals"

To: STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: A proposal for motion 5 "Arithmetic operations for intervals"
From: Nate Hayes <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:55:47 -0400
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> For instance, we can (and IMHO should) choose that -0 and +0 (in
> Level 2 of IEEE 754) represent the same value corresponding to
> the real value 0, and the sign of the representation would not
> necessarily be specified.

I agree.

Nate

Prev by Date: Re: A proposal for motion 5 "Arithmetic operations for intervals"
Next by Date: Re: A proposal for motion 5 "Arithmetic operations for intervals"
Previous by thread: Re: A proposal for motion 5 "Arithmetic operations for intervals"
Next by thread: Re: A proposal for motion 5 "Arithmetic operations for intervals"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread