Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Discussion period started Re: Proposal of Motion 6, version 3

Vincent

On 6 Aug 2009, at 00:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:


On 2009-07-29 10:00:45 +0200, Arnold Neumaier wrote:

Jürgen Wolff v Gudenberg schrieb:

 I think  motion 6  will give a solid foundation of the standard


I agree that Motion 6 converged to something convincing.
(The criticism by Dominique Lohez that ± infinity are handled
as numbers seems to me unfounded; they occur only as bounds,
not as elements of intervals.)

Therefore, I recommend voting with yes.


I completely agree. But here are a few comments:
...
Many thanks for this very careful reading, and insightful comments. More detailed response shortly. I wonder what other people think about "interval mapping" including "interval function" instead of them being mutually exclusive? 

John