Re: Motion P1788/M007.01_NaI: Discussion period begins
On 2009-08-08 15:02:06 +0200, Arnold Neumaier wrote:
> The motion was for having a unique NaI, in which case the
> propagation rule is OK.
>
> But I think there should either be no NaI (which I'd favor),
> or there should be NaI with payload.
I agree. BTW, implementations can still have their own extensions
for constructs that are not defined by the standard. Such extensions
could be standardized later. The NaI currently seems too theoretical
and may not match what would really be useful in practice.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)