Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2009-09-21 10:41:07 +0200, Arnold Neumaier wrote:The little difference may be decisive, though, for example when checking algebraic numbers for their sign, using multiprecision arithmetic. x in 1e-10000 + [0,Inf] encodes sign information, which is lost when going to midrad.Yes, but such kind of application (where intervals can be very large), you should use infsup. Don't use midrad if your application is not suited for midrad.
I had thought it was you who had been recommending midrad for rigorous multipresicion calculations. One of the major uses of these is, as far as I know, to make correct decisions in borderline cases of geometric algorithms such as line-sweeping or ray tracing. One can easily get very large intervals when dividing by a narrow interval very close to zero. I don't know how frequent this is, but it is certainly possible. Arnold Neumaier