Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
From: Christian Keil <c.keil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:03:09 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.5)

My vote on this Motion is

NO.

I'm following Arnold's reasoning here. My vote would change to yes ifwe recommend or require an accurately rounded scalar product.


Christian

Follow-Ups:
- Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
  - From: Alexandre Goldsztejn

Prev by Date: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct: NO
Previous by thread: M009.01 Exact dot product : NO
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread