Re: M0008.02_Exception_Handling YES
My vote is "YES"
I agree with George that more is work is needed to get
solid standard verbiage. However, discussions
at Dagstuhl have led to my understanding "decorations" more,
and, although there is a down side, they're not so bad.
We do need SOME kind of exception handling, and there is
more than one exception we need. Something like a "decoration"
naturally follows from that.
Baker
Corliss, George wrote:
YES to M0008.02 Exception_Handling
Discussions at Dagstuhl this week have convinced me that I do not care much
for the concept of decorations - they are too complicated - but I like much
LESS any alternative I have yet heard.
As the motion promises, I expect further clarifying discussions. I hope we
can simplify what is described so far.
Dr. George F. Corliss
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Haggerty Engineering #296
Marquette University
P.O. Box 1881
1515 W. Wisconsin Ave.
Milwaukee WI 53201-1881
George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
414-288-6599; -288-4400 (GasDay); -288-5579 (Fax)
Www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------