Re: Proposed amendment to Motion 10

[Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:55:20 -1900
> To: stds-1788                           <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Michel Hack                                 <hack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Proposed amendment to Motion 10
> 
> (If Juergen agrees, this could simply be a "friendly" amendment.)
> 
> Following the table of functions, add the paragraph:
> 
>     The ranges shown in the table above are the mathematical
>     range of the point function.  The interval result must
>     satisfy the containment rule and may thus include values
>     just outside the mathematical range.
> 
> . . .
> 
> Michel.
> ---Sent: 2009-12-01 03:08:31 UTC

	Simple.  Direct.  To the point.  Good.

	If this is a formal motion for amendment, I will second it.

	But I also ask Juergen to accept it as friendly.

	It harms nothing in the merits of the motion & clarifies
	a problem that might keep people from voting for it.

	Thanks, Michel.

				Dan