Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Baker, Nate all the others after rewriting the motion I expect only one single vote. sorry for being not clear Juergen Ralph Baker Kearfott schrieb:
Juergen, Can you clarify? If necessary, the motion can be withdrawn, resubmitted, and we can discuss further. Baker Nate Hayes wrote:Michel Hack wrote:Note: Baker's vote invitation was:Subject: Motion P1788/M0010.20:ElementaryFunctions: Voting period beginsThere is some confusion about the M0010.20 however -- perhaps it should be denoted M0010.22. That's because earlier we were asked to vote separately on three items:M0010.10 List of required functions M0010.20 Postpone details M0010.30 General powerI am one of those confused :-)Baker or Jeurgen, could one of you clarify if we're still voting on three separate items or if it should just be a single YES/NO vote?Nate
-- ======= o Prof. Dr. J. Wolff v. Gudenberg, Informatik 2 / \ Univ. Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg info2 o Tel.: +49 931 / 31-86602 Fax: +49 931 / 888-6603 / \ Uni e-mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx o o Wuerzburg http://www2.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/