Re: Motion 11
Marco
On 7 Feb 2010, at 20:06, Marco Nehmeier wrote:
> I'm still working on it. I will send my new version of the motion tomorrow.
>
> My intention to write a motion about the basic operations only was to have an analog process as with motion 5 and 10.
(I guess you mean: analogous.) Thank you for this. I look forward to your revised motion and the rationale for it.
I hope you have time to take into account Ulrich's remarks about expressing the tables more economically. I did not have time to analyse them in detail but simple analysis about the relation between, say, reverse "/" and forward "*" suggested possible simplifications. Of course, what the group decides about _providing_ reverse operations will be normative, whereas the tables are only informative and can thus be optimised in slow time.
Regards
John