Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Discussion period extended? Re: Motion 11.01 Basic Reverse Interval Operations



I'd like to offer a mild argument AGAINST Motion 11.  I prefer a standard as simple as possible, but that still provided intervals.

I agree that reverse interval operations are useful; I have programmed and used them, too.

If this were a programming language standard, I would accept reverse interval operations.

However, P1788 is intended as primarily a hardware (or hardware-like) standard.  Vendors are more likely to implement our standard if there is a clear market.  The fewer features we write into the standard, the easier it is to implement.

If we add all the features any of us would like to see, we may end up with such a feature-rich standard that it is to heavy to implement and too hard to document a compelling market need for every feature.  The outcome I fear is an un-implemented standard.

Any market survey people or hardware implementation people are welcome to make the opposite case.

Dr. George F. Corliss
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Marquette University
P.O. Box 1881
1515 W. Wisconsin Ave
Milwaukee WI 53201-1881 USA
414-288-6599; GasDay: 288-4400; Fax 288-5579
George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg


On Feb 9, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:

> P-1788 members:
> 
> It has been suggested that we extend the discussion period
> for Motion 11.  Please post any objections.
> 
> If no objections are posted, the discussion period will be
> extended until the end of Tuesday, February 23, at which
> time voting will begin on the motion in the form it is
> at that time (unless there are objections at that time).
> 
> Juergen:  Please update the motion number with the amended motion,
>          and post the amended motion.
> 
> Best regards to all,
> 
> Baker
> 
> On 2/8/2010 11:53 AM, Marco Nehmeier wrote:
>> P1788,
>> 
>> I have amended Motion 11.
>> 
>> Thanks to comments by Nate, Frédéric, John, Baker, Ulrich, Juergen and
>> Stefan.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Marco
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
> (337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
> URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
> Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
> (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
> Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------