Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0011.01: NO

To: owner-stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0011.01: NO
From: Jean-Pierre Merlet <Jean-Pierre.Merlet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:23:05 +0100
Cc: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B953289.5070101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: INRIA
References: <4B953289.5070101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jean-Pierre.Merlet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)

Dear colleagues,

my vote is NO, many people have alredy mentioned very good reasons.

Follow-Ups:
- Motion P1788/M0011.01: NO
  - From: Michael Schulte

References:
- Motion P1788/M0011.01: NO
  - From: Andreas Rauh

Prev by Date: Re: A decorations question
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0009.01_ExactDotProduct NO
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0011.01: NO
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0011.01: NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread