Re: Discussion on tetrits motion
> From: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "P1788" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Discussion on tetrits motion
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:59:16 -0500
>
> Dan, et. al.
>
> In your 4/17 post, for all 3-bits you included the explicit tables:
>
No, Nate.
Those tables were part of a discussion that
only applied to the 'domain' decoration as
I understood it at the time.
In the motion just made, you will notice
that there are no such tables. The reason
for this is that they will not apply to all
decorations.
And, as this motions says nothing about any
particular decoration, I would like to make
discussion of particular decorations the
subject of some future motion.
As I said in the cover letter.
Dan