Re: Motion 13 terminology and notation
Baker,
I am mostly indifferent to issues of notation. And
my remarks about absolute comparisons are more in
the nature of questions than suggestions. If people
feel they are needed we can make a later motion.
So, go ahead on schedule as far as I'm concerned.
Thank you for the consideration,
Dan
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:27:59 -0500
> From: Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Motion 13 terminology and notation
>
> Bo, Dan, Ulrich,
>
> Do you wish to post alterations (as a friendly amendment) before
> the end of the discussion period (which is in a day)?
>
> Baker
>
> On 4/26/2010 08:12, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Motion 13 should follow the terminology and notation defined by
> > previous motions.
> >
> > The last paragraph of the introduction should follow Motion 6.04,
> > in particular its section 3.6.1 (FF is not necessarily a set of
> > floating-point numbers, and FF should contain the infinities, as
> > described by this section).
> >
> > In Section 2 of Motion 13, the bounds should not be denoted a_1
> > and a_2, but with bars (see Motion 1).
> >
> > Typography: for "inf" (and other words, but in particular for "inf")
> > in math mode, please use \mathit{inf} for correct kerning.
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
> (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
> URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
> Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
> (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
> Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------