| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dan On 28 Apr 2010, at 15:40, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote: > Well, abolishing 'bounded' was neither my intention nor > something that follows for me from motion 15. For the (Level-1-ish) meaning of the 'bounded' property that I attribute to it in the current draft text, that your new definition abolishes it is not a matter of opinion but fact. It is not a 'pointwise' property. End of. Or as they say your side, period. John