| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Nate, Dan, everyone On 4 May 2010, at 14:56, Nate Hayes wrote: > I still partly think P1788 only needs to specify bit-encodings for > interchange formats and not internal representations of various conforming > implementations. This remains my default position and I don't feel Dan or anyone else has made a convincing case for doing otherwise. John