Re: mid-rad, inf-sup, etc.
On 9 May 2010 at 19:31, Hossam A. H. Fahmy wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 9 May 2010 19:31:54 +0300
Subject: Re: mid-rad, inf-sup, etc.
From: "Hossam A. H. Fahmy" <hfahmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
......
>
>
> However, I differ with Michel on the issue of having mid-rad as a "secondary"
> type where it receives a "second class treatment" and does not get its own
...
Moreover, many facts lead me to conclude that mid-rad is a "primary type"
deserving a "first class treatment"!
Svetoslav