Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

A motion on I/O

To: P1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: A motion on I/O
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 04:04:38 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

P1788 members

Attached please find a position paper containing a motion on what should be the concept, and specification, of I/O in the standard. I believe it will be motion 17.

Best wishes

John Pryce

Attachment: JDP_IO_ProposalV2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A motion on I/O
  - From: Christian Keil
- Re: A motion on I/O
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals

Prev by Date: Re: A mid-rad interchange motion...
Next by Date: [P1788]: Motion 15 discussion period ends tomorrow
Previous by thread: [P1788]: Motion 15 discussion period ends tomorrow
Next by thread: Re: A motion on I/O
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread