Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0015.01 NO

> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:24:43 -0500
> From: Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
>  stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0015.01 NO
> 
> Dan,
> 
> The final decision is yours, but motion 15 doesn't
> look like it would pass.  You should definitely
> withdraw it if you now feel there are better approaches.
> It would save the working group effort, and would
> probably increase the chances of us having a better
> standard.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Baker


	Well, since Chenyi did me the courtesy of seconding
	the motion I think I should do him the courtesy of
	asking his permission to withdraw it.

	But you are correct, I no longer believe this is
	the best approach for us & feel it should be
	withdrawn.

	So, with Chenyi permission, I withdraw it with my
	apologies to the group for the time it took.


			   Dan