Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0014.02: 6.1_and_6.2_of_document: up for discussion



If this is to be a proper motion, it needs a second.  Is there a second?

George Corliss
unofficial process nag


On Jun 8, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:

> P-1788:
> 
> Version 1 of this motion failed due to lack of a quorum.
> However, we did obtain some instructive comments from the
> "no" votes, and John has prepared a revised version taking
> these into account.  I am therefore putting the revised motion
> up for its 3-week discussion period.  The discussion will continue
> until after the end of Tuesday, June 29.  The original motion
> is appended, and I have attached the PDF with John's revised
> text.
> 
> William / Juergen: Please record this action in the minutes.
> 
> Juergen: Please also post the revised text and update the
> status on the web page, as you have consistently done.
> 
> I offer thanks for the previous and continuing work of all
> involved.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Baker (acting chair)
> 
> P.S. People who did not vote on version 1 of this motion are
>     on notice that they will be dropped from the roster of
>     voting members if they do not vote on version 2 of this
>     motion.  (The voting will start after June 29 and
>     proceed for three weeks.)  The roster of voting members
>     is independent of membership on the mailing list.
> 
> 
> =================================================================
> 
> Proposer: Dan Zuras
> 
> Second: Bo Einarsson
> 
> Motion:
> -------
> 
> The text in sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the current draft, Version
> 02.2, of the draft P1788 standard text shall be accepted as
> official text of the standard. Please note the following.
> 
> 1. A two thirds majority is required for this motion to pass.
> 
> 2. The text will be revised as a whole in approximately July
>   2011; thus the decision to accept this text does not set it
>   in stone. A revision to accepted text will not be made before
>   then (except for removing typos) unless a clear inconsistency
>   in the text is uncovered.
> 
> 3. Following our procedures, a NO vote to this motion should be
>   accompanied by a description of the changes that would enable
>   the voter to vote YES.
> -- 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
> (337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
> URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
> Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
> (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
> Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> <P1788_MAIN.pdf>

Dr. George F. Corliss
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Marquette University
P.O. Box 1881
1515 W. Wisconsin Ave
Milwaukee WI 53201-1881 USA
414-288-6599; GasDay: 288-4400; Fax 288-5579
George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg