Re: Motion P1788/M0014.02: 6.1_and_6.2_of_document: up for discussion
I second version 2 of this motion.
Bo
On Tue, June 8, 2010 3:57 pm, Corliss, George wrote:
> My previous message may have been out of order.
> Did Dan Zuras move and Bo Einarsson second this motion?
>
> George Corliss
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
>
>> P-1788:
>>
>> Version 1 of this motion failed due to lack of a quorum.
>> However, we did obtain some instructive comments from the
>> "no" votes, and John has prepared a revised version taking
>> these into account. I am therefore putting the revised motion
>> up for its 3-week discussion period. The discussion will continue
>> until after the end of Tuesday, June 29. The original motion
>> is appended, and I have attached the PDF with John's revised
>> text.
>>
>> William / Juergen: Please record this action in the minutes.
>>
>> Juergen: Please also post the revised text and update the
>> status on the web page, as you have consistently done.
>>
>> I offer thanks for the previous and continuing work of all
>> involved.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Baker (acting chair)
>>
>> P.S. People who did not vote on version 1 of this motion are
>> on notice that they will be dropped from the roster of
>> voting members if they do not vote on version 2 of this
>> motion. (The voting will start after June 29 and
>> proceed for three weeks.) The roster of voting members
>> is independent of membership on the mailing list.
>>
>>
>> =================================================================
>>
>> Proposer: Dan Zuras
>>
>> Second: Bo Einarsson
>>
>> Motion:
>> -------
>>
>> The text in sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the current draft, Version
>> 02.2, of the draft P1788 standard text shall be accepted as
>> official text of the standard. Please note the following.
>>
>> 1. A two thirds majority is required for this motion to pass.
>>
>> 2. The text will be revised as a whole in approximately July
>> 2011; thus the decision to accept this text does not set it
>> in stone. A revision to accepted text will not be made before
>> then (except for removing typos) unless a clear inconsistency
>> in the text is uncovered.
>>
>> 3. Following our procedures, a NO vote to this motion should be
>> accompanied by a description of the changes that would enable
>> the voter to vote YES.
>> --
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
>> (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
>> URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
>> Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
>> (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
>> Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> <P1788_MAIN.pdf>
>
> Dr. George F. Corliss
> Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Marquette University
> P.O. Box 1881
> 1515 W. Wisconsin Ave
> Milwaukee WI 53201-1881 USA
> 414-288-6599; GasDay: 288-4400; Fax 288-5579
> George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg
>
--
Bo Einarsson
Mathematics Department
LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY
SE-581 83 LINKÖPING
SWEDEN
Tel. +46 13 151896