Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Why (IMO) you should vote Yes to Motion 14.02



Dan Zuras wrote:
Let the mapping from level 1 to level 2 be defined by the
narrowest mapping possible.  That is, of all the objects
that exist in your representation that represent supersets
of a given level 1 interval, let the mapping be to some
object which is a subset of all of them.  There may be
many such mappings.  And the are all, of course, equal in
the above sense.

As Baker seems to suggests, perhaps there are a few reasons to study this a little more. But my first impression is it sounds feasible.




Now, with mappings back & forth we can define arithmetic.

Let any operation be defined by mapping its operand(s) to
level 1, applying that operation there, finding the
contiguous hull of the result there & mapping that result
back into your format in the tightest sense as defined
above.

That gets us most of it.  Doesn't it?

I like this idea.

Nate