Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Is there a second? Re: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Is there a second? Re: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
From: Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:21:39 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4C7686CB.7020402@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <4C7686CB.7020402@xxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2

 P-1788,

Dominique has just submitted an interesting possible enhancement of the basic comparison
specifications in Motion 13.04 (presently under discussion).  Do I have a second, to begin
formal discussion of this extension / enhancement?

Baker

On 8/26/2010 10:22 AM, Dominique Lohez wrote:

p1788

Please find herein attached a propsition of motion on a framework for Interval comparison

Regards,

Dominique LOHEZ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a second? Re: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals

References:
- Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
  - From: Dominique Lohez

Prev by Date: More Re: status of Motion P1788/M0017.04
Next by Date: Re: Motion13, Version 4
Previous by thread: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
Next by thread: Re: Is there a second? Re: Motion on Interval Comparison : a framework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread