Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity

To: P1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 14:25:11 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

P1788

In the position paper circulated yesterday, I noticed two places where the word "it" needs changing as it is ambiguous. I will send a revision, but will wait a few days for news of any other typos. Please look for them.

John Pryce

Prev by Date: Re: Do I have a second? Re: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
Next by Date: Re: Do I have a second? Re: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
Previous by thread: Re: Motion P1788/0023.01:NoMidRad -- VOTING PERIOD BEGINS
Next by thread: YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread