Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Do I have a second? (Motion to not support mid-rad

Dan Zuras wrote:

Their equivalent to our double was a 64-bit datatype
they called single.  (They came from Minnesota but

they thought like Texans. :-)


Quite typical for us Minnesotans. :-)

Nate Hayes

References:
- Motion P1788/0019.01: Explicit/Implicit idatatypes
  - From: John Pryce
- Motion P1788/0019.01: Explicit/Implicit idatatypes -- voting period begins
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Re: YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
  - From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Re: YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
  - From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Re: YES on Motion P1788/0019.01
  - From: Arnold Neumaier
- Basenote drift to the value of mid-rad forms...
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Re: Basenote drift to the value of mid-rad forms...
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Re: Basenote drift to the value of mid-rad forms...
  - From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Basenote drift to the value of mid-rad forms...
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Do I have a second? (Motion to not support mid-rad
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Re: Do I have a second? (Motion to not support mid-rad
  - From: Nate Hayes
- Re: Do I have a second? (Motion to not support mid-rad
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals