P1788,
Voting on Motion M0019.01 Explicit/Implicit idatatypes ends on Saturday,
October 2.
Current count: Yes: 5; No: 2; Required for quorum: 37
There has been much discussion, but not many votes.
Also in their voting periods:
M0013.04 Comparison_Relations
M0020.01 Comparing_comparisons
No votes have been cast
I underline Baker's recent observation encouraging us to actively discuss
during the discussion period, rather than waiting for the voting.
Baker's opening of the voting period is appended below.
Dr. George F. Corliss
P1788 Voting Tabulator
From: Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: September 11, 2010 1:28:55 PM CDT
To: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: P1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion P1788/0019.01: Explicit/Implicit idatatypes -- voting
period begins
Reply-To: <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
P1788 members:
The discussion period for Motion 19 is now officially ended, and
the voting period herewith begins, to run until the end of Saturday,
October 2. (The voting period may be extended at the discretion
of the vote tabulator if a quorum is not reached by then.) The
voting rules are those for position papers.
The motion and rationale are available as links on the page
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/private/Motions/AllMotions.html
in the private area of the official web site. (Please contact me if
you need a password for the private area.)
Juergen: Please update the information on the web page.
William: Please record the transaction in the minutes.
Best regards,
Baker (acting as chair, P-1788)
On 8/19/2010 11:23, John Pryce wrote:
P1788
I hereby submit a motion that P1788 shall support both explicit and
implicit interval formats (now to be renamed interval datatypes,
idatatypes). I believe it is Motion 19. Details are in the attached paper,
which is a revision of the one on the same subject I circulated in July.
Proposer: John Pryce.
Second: Dan Zuras.
John Pryce