Re: Overflow and Inf
Nate Hayes wrote:
Please note in your message below: "apparently", "I haven't yet had the
time to read through the 754 documentation...", "if it is...", "if it is
not..." etc. There is NOTHING that sounds certain about any of that.
This is only because I rely on information that Ian McIntosh and you
regard as certain, but that I haven't checked yet. I have many other
things to do besides carrying on these time-consuming 1788 discussions.
But I wouldn't recommend putting any of this into the standard
(or help presenting a motion on it) unless all these doubts are
completely eliminated.
Arnold Neumaier