Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

P1788 M0020.01 NO

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: P1788 M0020.01 NO
From: Marco Nehmeier <nehmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:54:16 +0200
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

It ist an interesting Motion on a mathematical level but I thing it is far beyond the scope of an interval standard.
So my vote is NO

Best regards
Marco

Follow-Ups:
- P1788 M0020.01 NO
  - From: Stefan Siegel

Prev by Date: P1788 M0013.04 YES
Next by Date: P1788 M0013.04 YES
Previous by thread: P1788 M0013.04 YES
Next by thread: P1788 M0020.01 NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread