Re: Discussion paper: what are the level 2 datums?
John,
Your "summary (1.6) " looks like a reasonable content of a motion, while the previous
sections of your attached document provide your rationale for the summary. However,
I'm puzzled a bit over your "1.1 Equality of intervals," and I'm wondering if you
can clarify or be more succinct. Furthermore, in your summary, you don't seem to
summarize when two datums are considered equal. Do you need to?
Best regards,
Baker
On 10/5/2010 11:19, John Pryce wrote:
P1788
I submit the attached paper for discussion, following which I aim to make it a motion.
John Pryce
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------